My wife’s dad is from Grenada, and we visited there last October. It was an incredible place and we thoroughly enjoyed ourselves, but, when I was speaking with one of my father-in-law’s relatives, I unknowingly committed a geo-political faux pas.
It had been a while since I had traveled to a less commercialized destination and, unaware that the relevant categorizations had changed, I said something about being proud of myself because I thought I had gotten too soft to travel in a Third World country. A group of us stayed in a modest seaside villa. The air conditioning was iffy. The water pressure often barely a trickle. My wife and I didn’t have hot water for a week. I bathed in the ocean or the pool. The steering wheel was on the opposite side of the car, and we drove on the opposite side of the patched or crumbling, precipitous roads. And we amateur-Anthony Bourdained our way through practically every meal. We were forced outside our comfort zone, and I found it wonderful, exhilarating and, ultimately, therapeutic.
My father-in-law’s relation listened patiently and then politely corrected me. “The term ‘Third World’ is discouraged, now,” they said. “These days, we say “developing nation.”
I promptly apologized and we continued our conversation. We discussed my travels and many of the developing nations I’d had adventures in over the years. I think they realized I wasn’t the average “Ugly American.”
The term “developing nation” avoids the derogatory connotations of “Third World” nation which, in the last half of the 20th century referred to countries that were economically underdeveloped and had little or no affiliation with major or “First World” powers (i.e., Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the United Kingdom, the United States, etc.). Many countries formerly dubbed “Third World” nations were also disparagingly deemed “Banana Republics,” which connoted small, poor nations often hamstrung by limited resources and sometimes led by despotic or authoritarian regimes big on corruption and economic exploitation. These countries usually functioned poorly for their general citizenry while disproportionately benefiting a specific “elite” group or class of individuals.
Today, this thought process often comes to mind when Lone Star politicians and pundits try to establish rube cred by threatening to secede from the United States. It simply demonstrates that they don’t know much about most of the rest of the world, much less their own state’s place or perception in the eyes of most of the rest of the world.
These days, America, itself, is hardly impressive or inspiring, specifically because it seems that only Americans are ignorant of their nation’s imperialist agenda. Everyone else knows.
And if so many people are attempting to migrate to the United States it’s not so much that anything is great here—it’s because they, like us, prefer being the boot rather than the ass. The United States bootheel hardly discriminates between the guilty and the innocent in foreign states.
But America as a whole is Camelot compared to Texas.
Texas is unrepentantly Third World and would become Third World on steroids if it seceded. And not because Texas is small, poor, has limited resources or lacks connections with First World powers—it certainly wouldn’t be considered a developing nation. It would be Third World because it’s governed by a rabid, despotic governor and legislature rife with corruption, keen on economic exploitation, and defiantly proud of functioning poorly for its citizenry while disproportionately benefiting a specific “elite” group or gaggle of entitled individuals. So much so that no one even bothers to deny it any more. And, this, trumpeted alongside blatant political chauvinism, gleeful censorship, innumerable challenges to fair representation and frequent, reprehensible threats to freedom of speech, reveals what we really are: ugly.
Ugly Texans.
While we may seem attractive to every Golden State “God and Guns” troglodyte, we are repulsive to decent, fair-minded people all over the world. We seem to aspire to a virulent checklist of vomitous superlatives like most sexist, most racist, most homophobic, most xenophobic, most fascist, most ignorant, and, yes, let’s throw it in—most unAmerican.
This is who we’ve become. These are the “values” our legislature champions.
If the United States was Europe, we’d be the Brexiting British. If the United States was Asia, we wouldn’t be Japan or even China—we’d be North Korea. We’re an international embarrassment full of clueless, separatist blowhards, and the Texas Lege is doing everything it can to ban mirrors.
The post Ugly Texas first appeared on Dissident Voice.
This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by E.R. Bills.
E.R. Bills | Radio Free (2024-04-16T23:36:09+00:00) Ugly Texas. Retrieved from https://www.radiofree.org/2024/04/16/ugly-texas/
Please log in to upload a file.
There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.