Radio Free never accepts money from corporations, governments or billionaires – keeping the focus on supporting independent media for people, not profits. Since 2010, Radio Free has supported the work of thousands of independent journalists, learn more about how your donation helps improve journalism for everyone.

Make a monthly donation of any amount to support independent media.





Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership

As NATO wrapped up its Summit and Biden held a crucial press conference, the media frenzy continued to focus on Biden’s age and cognitive abilities. Is he too old and disoriented to lead the “free world”? Was he able to get through his press conference without stumbling too many times? Lost in the media coverage More

The post Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership appeared first on CounterPunch.org.

Image by Marek Studzinski.

As NATO wrapped up its Summit and Biden held a crucial press conference, the media frenzy continued to focus on Biden’s age and cognitive abilities. Is he too old and disoriented to lead the “free world”? Was he able to get through his press conference without stumbling too many times? Lost in the media coverage about the Summit, however, has been a serious discussion of NATO’s advanced age and NATO’s ability to lead the “free world.”

At 75, NATO has not aged well. Back in 2019, French President Emmanuel Macron was already sounding the alarm, accusing NATO of being “brain dead.” While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has given NATO a new lease on life, NATO’s embrace of Ukraine actually makes the conflict–and the world–more dangerous.

Let’s remember why NATO was founded. As the contours of the Cold War were emerging after the devastation of WWII, 10 European nations, along with the U.S. and Canada, came together in 1949 to create an alliance that would deter Soviet expansion, stop the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encourage European political integration. Or, as the alliance’s first Secretary General Lord Ismay quipped, its purpose was “to keep the Soviets out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”

It is decades now since the Soviet Union has disintegrated and European nations have been well integrated. So why is NATO still hanging on? When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, along with its military alliance called the Warsaw Pact, NATO could have–and should have–declared victory and folded. Instead, it expanded from 16 members in 1991 to 32 members today.

Its eastward expansion not only violated the promises made by Secretary of State James Baker to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, but it was a grave mistake. U.S. diplomat George Keenan warned in 1997 “expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold-War era.” Indeed, while NATO expansion does not justify Russia’s 2022 illegal invasion of Ukraine, it did provoke Russia and inflame tensions. NATO members also played a key role in the Ukraine’s 2014 coup, the training and arming of Ukrainian forces in preparation for war with Russia, and the quashing of negotiations that could have ended the war in its first two months.

After two years of brutal war, the NATO Summit focused on how to shore up Ukraine’s flailing efforts to repel Russia. The insistence on setting up a “Trump-proof” scenario that would guarantee Ukraine billions in military aid for years to come and an “irreversible path” to NATO membership is really a guarantee that the war will drag on for years–precisely because NATO membership is Russia’s number one concern. There was no talk at the Summit of how to end the war by moving towards a ceasefire and peace talks. Why? Because NATO is a military alliance. The only tool it has is a hammer.

We have seen NATO illegally and unsuccessfully wield that hammer in country after country over the past 30 years. From Bosnia and Serbia to Afghanistan and Libya, NATO has justified this violence and instability as defending “the Rules-Based Order,” while repeatedly violating the core precepts of the UN Charter.

NATO is now a military behemoth with partners far beyond the North Atlantic that encircle the globe from Colombia to Mongolia to Australia. It has proven to be an aggressive alliance that initiates and escalates wars without international consensus, exacerbates global instability, and prioritizes arms deals over humanitarian needs. NATO provides a cover for the U.S. to place nuclear weapons in five European nations, bringing us closer to nuclear war in violation of both the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. NATO is endangering us all in a desperate attempt to reassert U.S. global hegemony in what is now a multipolar world.

NATO’s 75th anniversary is an opportune time to take stock of NATO’s outdated world view and violations of international law. NATO should be laid to rest so we can revitalize and democratize the proper venue for dealing with global conflicts: the United Nations.

The post Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership appeared first on CounterPunch.org.


This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by Medea Benjamin.


Print Share Comment Cite Upload Translate Updates

Leave a Reply

APA

Medea Benjamin | Radio Free (2024-07-12T05:57:27+00:00) Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership. Retrieved from https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/

MLA
" » Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership." Medea Benjamin | Radio Free - Friday July 12, 2024, https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/
HARVARD
Medea Benjamin | Radio Free Friday July 12, 2024 » Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership., viewed ,<https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/>
VANCOUVER
Medea Benjamin | Radio Free - » Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership. [Internet]. [Accessed ]. Available from: https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/
CHICAGO
" » Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership." Medea Benjamin | Radio Free - Accessed . https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/
IEEE
" » Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership." Medea Benjamin | Radio Free [Online]. Available: https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/. [Accessed: ]
rf:citation
» Similar to Biden, NATO Is Aged and Unfit for Leadership | Medea Benjamin | Radio Free | https://www.radiofree.org/2024/07/12/similar-to-biden-nato-is-aged-and-unfit-for-leadership-2/ |

Please log in to upload a file.




There are no updates yet.
Click the Upload button above to add an update.

You must be logged in to translate posts. Please log in or register.