In just three days, more rain fell on the Texas Gulf Coast than what flows out of the Mississippi River in three full weeks. Tiny Cedar Bayou got 51.9 inches, the most ever measured for a single storm in the continental United States. Hundreds of thousands of people were washed out of their homes, and more than 32,000 huddled in makeshift shelters. In the words of the National Weather Service, ?This event is unprecedented and all impacts are unknown and beyond anything experienced.?
This is an American disaster. It demands an American response. We stand with the people of Houston and of the region?and with their need for national-level emergency aid and long-term recovery support. This support must be both effective and equitable and must reduce the prospect that this kind of suffering will be repeated, in Houston or anywhere else.
One thing we learned from Superstorm Sandy, five years ago this fall, and Hurricane Katrina before that, is that local communities are central to the success of any plan for emergency assistance, short-term aid, and long-range recovery. These groups with boots on the ground will need our support, and we encourage you to give it.
Because right now, they are the ones who remain in harm’s way.?A small ocean of water engulfs the Houston region, creating unimaginable damage and loss. Much of the water is laden with a toxic mix of chemicals seeping from area refineries, chemical plants, and abandoned industrial and waste sites. Strange smells sweeping through the area underscore reports of air pollution emissions from the refineries that dominate the region and explosions at one chemical plant. We don?t know how much has been released because air monitors have shut down, but press and local reports estimate the number in the millions of pounds of volatile organic compounds, like benzene, and other nasty chemicals.
Much of the water contains sewage from flooded municipal treatment plants.?Public health officials are warning residents to stay out of the floodwaters. And there are drinking water concerns, too. Houston has been on a precautionary boil order, and there are fears that other drinking water systems could be compromised.?
Even after the storm has passed, the danger is unabated.?
And as people return to water-damaged homes, they face a high risk of living with mold, which can aggravate asthma, allergies, and other respiratory ills. After?Katrina, Sandy, and other disasters, we saw communities blighted by these issues?along with contaminated sediments, debris left standing, and continued lack of services that threatened public health long after the floodwaters receded. Those are conditions that should not be repeated but will be hard to avoid after a disaster of this scale. Resources will have to be made available fast and without the rancorous debates that followed Superstorm Sandy.?
As we?ve seen in past disasters, low-income communities and people of color tend to suffer disproportionate exposure to these dangers, often without receiving adequate care. Proximity to the sources of the contaminants, lack of information, and poor access to protective measures or the resources to just up and leave until the dangers are gone all conspire to make the impacts even more burdensome to these communities. That?s why, again, the needs of these communities must be front and center in the days and weeks to come.???????????
Of the roughly 800,000 households in Houston, fewer than one in six has flood insurance. That means a lot of people won?t have money to repair or rebuild. Even those who do will find it extremely difficult to receive federal aid that might help them move to higher ground. Some 43,000 families were on the wait list for affordable housing in Houston. That list is likely to grow, as local housing costs rise in response to the lack of supply, and if communities don?t quickly move to replace lost housing for low-income residents, a recurring problem after a flood disaster.????????????????????
Between 2005 and 2014, the federal government spent more than $278 billion on disaster rebuilding and recovery efforts?most commonly for floods, the nation?s most frequent and costly form of natural disaster.
To fix the problem, we put in place the Federal Flood Protection Standard in 2015, which requires better planning and protections for flood-prone infrastructure built with federal funds. Unfortunately, just as Harvey was beginning to stir in the Gulf of Mexico, President Trump rescinded those standards, part of what he called a ?disgraceful? permitting process. It didn?t take long for Harvey to show the folly in that. Now it?s time for Congress to demand a more responsible approach.
There are a bevy of additional very big issues laid bare by this disaster. They will all need to be addressed once we have begun to get communities along the Gulf back on their feet.
We have to make our cities more sustainable to avoid some of the infrastructure issues that further complicated Harvey?s impacts on Houston. We have to address the safety risks associated with private facilities, like refineries and chemical plants, and their health impacts on neighboring communities. We have to fix this country?s flawed flood policies, and fast, to stop putting Americans in harm?s way.?And most fundamentally, we?have an obligation to protect current and future generations from the growing dangers of such disasters made worse by climate change.?That?s what we?re committed to at NRDC, for the people?of the Gulf and for us all.Print